2021.2.6 sat -
3.28 sun

magazine

Observing, Controlling and Filming Human Movements— from the Relationship between Children of the 1980s and Jackie Chan Yosaku Matsutani

2021.2.18

Our web magazine includes articles that touch upon a wide range of ideas and offer a different perspective on the festival program. (This article has been shared from the print magazine of Kyoto Experiment 2021 Spring.)

Human movements, behavior and technique

I was presented with the theme of human movement, or human behavior, in writing this essay. Media historian John Durham Peters for example calls this the “technique” (Peters, 2015). He states that the technique is something that is incorporated into the body, and turns the body into a tool that reacts and behaves to the fluctuating environment, or communicates with other beings. By definition, technique is not limited to humans, or certain genders, generations or ethnicities, but is something that various forms of life including animals and plants are equipped with.

This idea of “technique” by Peters, is based on a theory by André Leroi-Gourhan and Marcel Mauss. In particular, Mauss classifies in detail various techniques of the body (mostly referring to the human body) such as sleeping, running, swimming and dancing based on age and ethnicity (Mauss, 1976[1968]). For example, the Australian soldier and French child can squat, but the French adult cannot. In this classification, Mauss points out that techniques of the body are of social hereditary, in that difference in society, ethnicity and age creates a difference in human movement and behavior.

Then is this to say that human movement, behavior or technique of the body is always inherently social as Mauss says, or is there a possibility of escaping this even for an instant? In this essay I will explore this question through Jackie Chan films and my own personal experiences.

Jackie Chan as Being-in-the-Home

NES, Weekly Shonen Jump, video cassette recorder, camcorder, Fanta Fruit Punch.

As a child who was born in 1976 and grew up in the 1980s, Hong Kong movie star Jackie Chan stood alongside these items. This stands in contrast to earlier kung fu movie star Bruce Lee.

Bruce Lee was a star of the 1970s, meaning he was a star to the generation before children of the 1980s. 1980s children therefore indirectly knew of his extraordinary strength and stardom through TV talents copying his eerie bird-like “Wataah!” and the manga character based on him, Kenshiro from Fist of the North Star. Above all, Bruce Lee was a star from the movie theatres, a world that most of us children knew little about. Therefore, to us, Bruce Lee was someone from a different world whom we could not directly touch; a kung fu movie star who in reality was difficult to understand, just like the Fanta Fruit Punch flavor.

Jackie Chan was however, inside our homes. His films were of course screened at the theatres, but for us, his reality existed inside the movies on TV or rented video tapes. Jackie Chan was a star inside the CRT monitors. The comical techniques of the body that this star exhibited, were in line with the perfectly calculated dynamic comedy scenes of Hachiji Dayo, Zenin Shugo! or the wild action scenes from Takeshi’s Castle, exciting the children of the 1980s sat in front of the TV. Moreover, Jackie Chan always spoke with the same voice (by voice actor Hiroya Ishimaru) and with the same language that we spoke. The witty conversations in Japanese that induced laughter, brought us much closer to this star. All in all, Jackie Chan was Being-in-the-Home; a familiar TV star to the children living in the 1980s.

Linkage and shared ownership

However, films starring Jackie Chan were shown on television when it was bedtime for children; which is why his films would often be watched on a video recording (or a rented video tape). Of course, not all families had a VCR player; children would gather at a friend’s house that did own one, and they would watch the film together in a group. This video system brought huge pleasure. By replaying the video, children were able to watch their favorite scenes over and over, and by fast-forwarding and rewinding, playing in slow and pausing, they could control the characters’ movements and behavior, always resulting in much laughter. Story development was never the main focus of Jackie Chan movies for children, it was rather the action and fighting scenes with comical touches, so being able to control movement and behaviour multiplied the pleasure of the film. Furthermore, unlike the preceding Bruce Lee films, perhaps it was the very style of the action and fighting scenes of Jackie Chan films that induced such a way of enjoying them.

As many critics have already pointed out, as a martial artist, Bruce Lee understood the genuineness of the action and fighting scenes of a film to be the most important factor in what affected the reception of a film. He therefore rejected the techniques of the body that were derived from Cantonese opera and classical Chinese opera (eg. illusory movements which used trampolines and wires to fly) that had been traditionally employed in Cantonese films, and was proactive about working with martial artists or actors who had a background in martial arts. He also did not focus on the characters’ facial expressions with close-ups as had been done previously, but rather captured the whole moving body with medium to long shots, and rather than complexly connecting these shots, he would present sequence shots or a minimal montage. Therefore, the action and fighting scenes in Bruce Lee films were established by continuously portraying raw bodies engaging with each other under the logic of martial arts.

Contrarily, maybe thanks to having a background in classical Chinese opera, Jackie Chan seems to capture action and fighting as an expression of movement and behavior, rather than martial arts. Borrowing French poet and critic Paul Valéry’s words, Jackie Chan’s action and fighting is “an art of human movement, of those that can be voluntary “, and like a dance. In truth, he does not beat the opponent(s) that he faces, but synchronizes, and by sharing ownership of the overall movement of the action or fighting in the scene as a number of units, versatile dances are scattered in the space. This shared ownership progresses in a very rhythmical manner, with the “hai! hai!” voices, clothes and sound of collision, and the instant moments of pause in which movement synchronizes with voice and sound. Jackie Chan also links and shares ownership with the chairs, tables, doors, windows and flooring in the space, exposing the characteristics of the materials (such as the glittering shattered glass, or a slippery floor), to make the entire world dance. However, the synchronization and sharing of ownership does not always succeed. A possibility of failure exists, and this moment of failure allows for a comical release, Jackie Chan’s face scrunches up and becomes even more adorable.

The elements in the action and fighting scenes in Jackie Chan films of synchronization and shared ownership, as well as their failure and comicality, provokes children gripping their remote controls to disturb them. The children are indeed provoked, and they fall about clapping their hands and hugging each other in laughter.

Tangible mimicry

However, the hands of the laughing children eventually turn toward their peers. Some children hurl their fists and feet into the air saying “hai! hai!”. And someone says – ‘let’s film it‛. Off we go into the back alley by the house, with the forbidden piece of equipment put out of bounds by our parents.

A game of rock-paper-scissors begins for the casting. The child who loses obviously becomes Jackie Chan; the reason is simple, the enemy has an immortal body and can endlessly attack Jackie Chan. The child playing Jackie Chan has to continue receiving the attacks from all the other enemies. This is in fact no different from Jackie Chan’s films. If this was a Bruce Lee film that aimed to be truthful to martial arts, where death existed, or at least you could sense it was there, things may have been different. But just like the enemies in NES, the enemies in Jackie Chan films may lose their hit points, but keep coming back at him without being defeated. The children accurately mimic this.

The children also try to mimic the movements and behaviors accurately; but this is extremely difficult. Which is why they aim for the rhythm of the “hai! hai!” voices, and the pauses in movement that appear in synch. The children playing enemy, equipped with the voices, movement and pauses and the rhythm, attack the child playing Jackie Chan who has been stripped to their undershirt on the que of the cameraman. They want the scrunched-up face of Jackie Chan they saw in the television. Jackie Chan does not want to make this face, and tries to avoid the on-coming attacks from peers, to defeat them and make a counterattack. However, unlike inside the television, the child Jackie Chan is defeated, powerless to the number of enemies. This is where cut is called.

We all rush into the house on the voice calling cut. Singing aloud together the song (with the wrong lyrics) that Jackie Chan always sung at the end of the films, we play the newly shot footage on video, just as with Jackie Chan’s films. This footage is far from an action or a fighting scene, and is just children hurling themselves at each other, but that isn’t a problem to us. This footage is fast-forwarded, rewound, stopped, and played in slow. By mimicking, we touch and become Jackie Chan’s films. We obtain an immortal body, and by becoming a character whose movement and behavior is controlled on a medium, we momentarily transcend the ordinary relationship and social meaning between our friends, the back alley, the living room and the television, floating in what Walter Benjamin called “room-for-play”[Spielraum]1. However, to mimic Jackie Chan’s films means to unknowingly embody the homosocial relationships and masculinity within these films, and it is difficult to say that we are free from this bias.2 In that sense, the feeling of momentarily transcending social meaning, and the idea of “room-for-play”, may be something established upon this bias. These mimicry shoots of Jackie Chan films usually ended with someone spraining their foot, tripping and hitting their head, or the child in the undershirt playing Jackie Chan complaining that it’s cold. The body that can feel and be injured is revealed, and the fun is spoilt for the children. The “room-for-play” eventually vanishes – the everyday begins again.

1 Inspired greatly by Masato Hase’s argument (Hase, 2017) on television, children and mimicry, and by Yoshikazu Takemine’s argument (Takemine, 2016) on the relationship between Benjamin’s “room-for-play” and film. Hiromi Saika has developed an excellent argument (Saika, 2019) on Jackie Chan films and “room-for-play”.
2 Reference to Saika’s argument (Saika, 2017) regarding the problems of sexuality and masculinity in Jackie Chan films.

References
Hiromi Saika, Asian Action Heroes in Hollywood Films – from “Enter the Dragon” to “Battle Creek Brawl”, Diaphanes: art and philosophy volume 4, (Kyoto University, bulletin of Atsuchi Okada Laboratory, Graduate School of Human and Environmental Studies, 2017), 95–114.
Hiromi Saika, The Spectacle of Falling and Repetition: Corporeality and Figuration in “Project A” and “Police Story”,
Japanese journal of image arts and science volume 101, (Japan Society of Image Arts and Sciences, 2019), 49–68. Yoshikazu Takemine, Medium of Benjamin, Adorno, Kluge, (University of Tokyo Press, 2016).
Masato Hase, Vernacular Modernism in Visual Cultures, (University of Tokyo Press, 2017).
Marcel Mausse, Sociology and Anthropology II, Translation by Toru Arichi and Toshio Yamaguchi, (Koubundou, 1976 [1968]).
Paul Valéry, Degas Danse Dessin, Translation by Toru Shimizu, (Chikuma Shobo, 2006 [1936]).
John Durham Peters, The Marvelous Clouds: Towards a Philosophy of Elemental Media, (Chicago: University of Press Chicago, 2015).

Yosaku Matsutani
Associate Professor of Kokugakuin University, Faculty of Letters. Specializes in aesthetics and art. The starting point of his research lies in assessing the relationship between visual media, that blossomed at the end of the 19th century, and the body, within the context of mechanics at the time. He is also currently exploring the possibilities of post-human sensibility, focusing on science, technology and art related to life and the environment.

fingerCheck these out too!

Masaru Kakio And Then

Florentina Holzinger Apollon (Screening) & Online Workshop

Ayaka Nakama & Choreography Freeway Dance

#newmovement #stunt #expandedperspective #film

back to all articles

Search more events in Kyoto

More Experiments

あいうえおかきくけこさしすせそたちつてとなにぬねのはひふへほまみむめもやゆよらりるれろわゐゑをがぎぐげござじずぜぞだぢづでどばびぶべぼぱぴぷぺぁぃぅぇぉっゃゅアイウエオカキクケコサシスセソタチツテトナニヌネノハヒフヘホマミムメモヤユヨラリルレロワヰヱヲガギグゲゴザジズゼゾダヂズデドバビブベボパピプペポァィゥェォッャュヴ亜哀挨愛曖悪握圧扱宛嵐安案暗以衣位囲医依委威為畏胃尉異移萎偉椅彙意違維慰遺緯域育一壱逸茨芋引印因咽姻員院淫陰飲隠韻右宇羽雨唄鬱畝浦運雲永泳英映栄営詠影鋭衛易疫益液駅悦越謁閲円延沿炎怨宴媛援園煙猿遠鉛塩演縁艶汚王凹央応往押旺欧殴桜翁奥横岡屋億憶臆虞乙俺卸音恩温穏下化火加可仮何花佳価果河苛科架夏家荷華菓貨渦過嫁暇禍靴寡歌箇稼課蚊牙瓦我画芽賀雅餓介回灰会快戒改怪拐悔海界皆械絵開階塊楷解潰壊懐諧貝外劾害崖涯街慨蓋該概骸垣柿各角拡革格核殻郭覚較隔閣確獲嚇穫学岳楽額顎掛潟括活喝渇割葛滑褐轄且株釜鎌刈干刊甘汗缶完肝官冠巻看陥乾勘患貫寒喚堪換敢棺款間閑勧寛幹感漢慣管関歓監緩憾還館環簡観韓艦鑑丸含岸岩玩眼頑顔願企伎危机気岐希忌汽奇祈季紀軌既記起飢鬼帰基寄規亀喜幾揮期棋貴棄毀旗器畿輝機騎技宜偽欺義疑儀戯擬犠議菊吉喫詰却客脚逆虐九久及弓丘旧休吸朽臼求究泣急級糾宮救球給嗅窮牛去巨居拒拠挙虚許距魚御漁凶共叫狂京享供協況峡挟狭恐恭胸脅強教郷境橋矯鏡競響驚仰暁業凝曲局極玉巾斤均近金菌勤琴筋僅禁緊錦謹襟吟銀区句苦駆具惧愚空偶遇隅串屈掘窟熊繰君訓勲薫軍郡群兄刑形系径茎係型契計恵啓掲渓経蛍敬景軽傾携継詣慶憬稽憩警鶏芸迎鯨隙劇撃激桁欠穴血決結傑潔月犬件見券肩建研県倹兼剣拳軒健険圏堅検嫌献絹遣権憲賢謙鍵繭顕験懸元幻玄言弦限原現舷減源厳己戸古呼固股虎孤弧故枯個庫湖雇誇鼓錮顧五互午呉後娯悟碁語誤護口工公勾孔功巧広甲交光向后好江考行坑孝抗攻更効幸拘肯侯厚恒洪皇紅荒郊香候校耕航貢降高康控梗黄喉慌港硬絞項溝鉱構綱酵稿興衡鋼講購乞号合拷剛傲豪克告谷刻国黒穀酷獄骨駒込頃今困昆恨根婚混痕紺魂墾懇左佐沙査砂唆差詐鎖座挫才再災妻采砕宰栽彩採済祭斎細菜最裁債催塞歳載際埼在材剤財罪崎作削昨柵索策酢搾錯咲冊札刷刹拶殺察撮擦雑皿三山参桟蚕惨産傘散算酸賛残斬暫士子支止氏仕史司四市矢旨死糸至伺志私使刺始姉枝祉肢姿思指施師恣紙脂視紫詞歯嗣試詩資飼誌雌摯賜諮示字寺次耳自似児事侍治持時滋慈辞磁餌璽鹿式識軸七叱失室疾執湿嫉漆質実芝写社車舎者射捨赦斜煮遮謝邪蛇尺借酌釈爵若弱寂手主守朱取狩首殊珠酒腫種趣寿受呪授需儒樹収囚州舟秀周宗拾秋臭修袖終羞習週就衆集愁酬醜蹴襲十汁充住柔重従渋銃獣縦叔祝宿淑粛縮塾熟出述術俊春瞬旬巡盾准殉純循順準潤遵処初所書庶暑署緒諸女如助序叙徐除小升少召匠床抄肖尚招承昇松沼昭宵将消症祥称笑唱商渉章紹訟勝掌晶焼焦硝粧詔証象傷奨照詳彰障憧衝賞償礁鐘上丈冗条状乗城浄剰常情場畳蒸縄壌嬢錠譲醸色拭食植殖飾触嘱織職辱尻心申伸臣芯身辛侵信津神唇娠振浸真針深紳進森診寝慎新審震薪親人刃仁尽迅甚陣尋腎須図水吹垂炊帥粋衰推酔遂睡穂随髄枢崇数据杉裾寸瀬是井世正生成西声制姓征性青斉政星牲省凄逝清盛婿晴勢聖誠精製誓静請整醒税夕斥石赤昔析席脊隻惜戚責跡積績籍切折拙窃接設雪摂節説舌絶千川仙占先宣専泉浅洗染扇栓旋船戦煎羨腺詮践箋銭潜線遷選薦繊鮮全前善然禅漸膳繕狙阻祖租素措粗組疎訴塑遡礎双壮早争走奏相荘草送倉捜挿桑巣掃曹曽爽窓創喪痩葬装僧想層総遭槽踪操燥霜騒藻造像増憎蔵贈臓即束足促則息捉速側測俗族属賊続卒率存村孫尊損遜他多汰打妥唾堕惰駄太対体耐待怠胎退帯泰堆袋逮替貸隊滞態戴大代台第題滝宅択沢卓拓託濯諾濁但達脱奪棚誰丹旦担単炭胆探淡短嘆端綻誕鍛団男段断弾暖談壇地池知値恥致遅痴稚置緻竹畜逐蓄築秩窒茶着嫡中仲虫沖宙忠抽注昼柱衷酎鋳駐著貯丁弔庁兆町長挑帳張彫眺釣頂鳥朝貼超腸跳徴嘲潮澄調聴懲直勅捗沈珍朕陳賃鎮追椎墜通痛塚漬坪爪鶴低呈廷弟定底抵邸亭貞帝訂庭逓停偵堤提程艇締諦泥的笛摘滴適敵溺迭哲鉄徹撤天典店点展添転填田伝殿電斗吐妬徒途都渡塗賭土奴努度怒刀冬灯当投豆東到逃倒凍唐島桃討透党悼盗陶塔搭棟湯痘登答等筒統稲踏糖頭謄藤闘騰同洞胴動堂童道働銅導瞳峠匿特得督徳篤毒独読栃凸突届屯豚頓貪鈍曇丼那奈内梨謎鍋南軟難二尼弐匂肉虹日入乳尿任妊忍認寧熱年念捻粘燃悩納能脳農濃把波派破覇馬婆罵拝杯背肺俳配排敗廃輩売倍梅培陪媒買賠白伯拍泊迫剥舶博薄麦漠縛爆箱箸畑肌八鉢発髪伐抜罰閥反半氾犯帆汎伴判坂阪板版班畔般販斑飯搬煩頒範繁藩晩番蛮盤比皮妃否批彼披肥非卑飛疲秘被悲扉費碑罷避尾眉美備微鼻膝肘匹必泌筆姫百氷表俵票評漂標苗秒病描猫品浜貧賓頻敏瓶不夫父付布扶府怖阜附訃負赴浮婦符富普腐敷膚賦譜侮武部舞封風伏服副幅復福腹複覆払沸仏物粉紛雰噴墳憤奮分文聞丙平兵併並柄陛閉塀幣弊蔽餅米壁璧癖別蔑片辺返変偏遍編弁便勉歩保哺捕補舗母募墓慕暮簿方包芳邦奉宝抱放法泡胞俸倣峰砲崩訪報蜂豊飽褒縫亡乏忙坊妨忘防房肪某冒剖紡望傍帽棒貿貌暴膨謀頬北木朴牧睦僕墨撲没勃堀本奔翻凡盆麻摩磨魔毎妹枚昧埋幕膜枕又末抹万満慢漫未味魅岬密蜜脈妙民眠矛務無夢霧娘名命明迷冥盟銘鳴滅免面綿麺茂模毛妄盲耗猛網目黙門紋問冶夜野弥厄役約訳薬躍闇由油喩愉諭輸癒唯友有勇幽悠郵湧猶裕遊雄誘憂融優与予余誉預幼用羊妖洋要容庸揚揺葉陽溶腰様瘍踊窯養擁謡曜抑沃浴欲翌翼拉裸羅来雷頼絡落酪辣乱卵覧濫藍欄吏利里理痢裏履璃離陸立律慄略柳流留竜粒隆硫侶旅虜慮了両良料涼猟陵量僚領寮療瞭糧力緑林厘倫輪隣臨瑠涙累塁類令礼冷励戻例鈴零霊隷齢麗暦歴列劣烈裂恋連廉練錬呂炉賂路露老労弄郎朗浪廊楼漏籠六録麓論和話賄脇惑枠湾腕𠮷