kyotoexperiment

tickets

KEX Supporters

magazine

Critics in Residence @Kyoto Experiment 2024 / Ilinca-Tamara Todoruţ

2025.6.13

Tianzhuo Chen & Siko Setyanto, Ocean Cage, 2024. Photo by Takuya Matsumi.

The Delegation of the European Union to Japan has held “Critics in Residence @Kyoto Experiment 2024” to explore the possibilities of criticism in culture and the arts during the international performing arts festival Kyoto Experiment 2024 (held 5-27 October). This initiative is organised by the Delegation of the European Union to Japan, operated by the Goethe-Institut Tokyo, and supported by Kyoto Experiment and the Saison Foundation.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

On Kyoto Experiment’s Curatorial Vision


The interdisciplinary theatre, dance, and performance art festival Kyoto Experiment (KEX) wowed me with the thoughtfulness of its curatorial vision. The three co-directors—Yoko Kawasaki, Yuya Tsukahara, and Juliet Reiko Knapp—nurtured a collective exploration of public culture and artmaking aware of local and global contexts. KEX took place over three weeks, between 5-27 October 2024, and included performances, talks, symposia, workshops, podcasts, exhibits, and residencies (many in collaboration with other institutions). My own participation was facilitated by a generous residency for European critics.

KEX showcased a relatively small number of performances, totaling fourteen works clustered to play three to four at a time each weekend. The airy scheduling gave space to events inviting the active participation of publics, artists, and guests. The approach indicated a type of festival that nurtures the social aspect of artmaking, that sees artistic products as vehicles for public discussion and social experimentation as much as aesthetic experimentation, that embraces art as communication and ways of thinking together through the issues pertaining to our collective existence. Celebrating its fifteenth edition, KEX 2024 opened its doors under the banner of the chosen key phrase “ētto ētto.” The catchphrase shows the festival’s invitation to dialogue and its dedication to championing works and ideas in progress rather than serving finished, polished products. The festival opened a space for interrogating the self in relation to others, the experimental in relation to heritage, and the present in relation to the past.

The 2024 lineup evidenced the vision of sustained questioning in search of viable collective futures, particularly when it came to the Japanese artists commissioned by KEX. In Stand by Me, playwright and director Shinichi Anasako together with dancer and choreographer Pijin Neji and electronic musician Tentenko storied a journey through the spirit world of human and fish casualties of an unnamed cataclysm that merged Noh aesthetics with contemporary sensibilities. Originally from Hiroshima, dancer and filmmaker Yasuko Yokoshi choreographed a meditation on history, identity, and the nation-state in response to Yoshiro Yoda Hatori’s complex and cryptic script Lynch (a play). Osaka-born dance artist Nanako Matsumoto paired with Taiwanese visual artist Anchi Lin (Ciwas Tahos) to devise Sticky Hands, Stitched Mountains, a performance of interaction with a material installation that reflected themes such as queerness, indigeneity, and the environment.

KEX’s support for the local art scene translated also into its promotion of a Fringe: More Experiments program that included twenty-nine additional performances. Another program, Kansai Studies, highlights the dependencies between artists, places, and societies and publicizes the type of non-instrumental knowledge disseminated by artistic practices. Yet another key event showcased at the festival, Echoes Now, was the result of a program for junior curators that trained them in the type of involved, intentional, and supportive curation practiced by the KEX directorial trio. Dialogue spaces and conversation opportunities mushroomed across Kyoto pre, during, and post-festival. A series of three talks invited university professors to connect the “ētto” theme with larger aspects of culture and society. The informal Festival Share Cafe gatherings welcomed spectators to chat about the shows. Among the efforts to include and widen the KEX public, a notable initiative provided childcare services during a selected number of performances.

Next, I want to highlight the efforts to connect Japanese artists, publics, and cultural workers with their international counterparts. The second strong presence in the main lineup was formed by a group of shows from other Asian countries, plus a Middle Eastern performance. Indonesian artists worked on two separate shows. Performance artist Melati Suryodarmo came to Kyoto prior to the festival to train the twenty-eight young women for a local iteration of Sweet Dreams Sweet, a durational performance that questions patriarchy. Jakarta-based dancer and choreographer Siko Setyanto shone in the multi-sensorial, immersive performative installation on indigenous whaling practices called Ocean Cage, directed by Beijinger artist Tianzhuo Chen. South Korean theatre-maker, music composer, and videographer Jaha Koo added to KEX’s artistic explorations of insular and peninsular Asian identities with his endearing performance Haribo Kimchi. Mehr Theatre Group’s Blind Runner, written and directed by Amir Reza Koohestani, stood out in the lineup due to its more distant geographical origin and its theatrical aesthetic centering language. Blind Runner shared a story about freedom and repression in contemporary Iran.

The rest of the six performances completing the lineup came in a bulk package of European dance artists liberally sponsored through the Dance Reflections by Van Cleef & Arpels program. The public in Kyoto had the opportunity to see works from some of the most renowned contemporary European choreographers and groups: Alessandro Sciarroni, (LA)HORDE × Rone with the Ballet national de Marseille, Ola Maciejewska, Christian Rizzo, Mathilde Monnier & Dominique Figarella. However, the different institutional frameworks between the European and the Japanese shows became apparent. If the latter premiered at KEX and retained the “ētto ētto” flavor of a work in progress first meeting an outside public, the Europeans brought finished, polished, widely presented and toured shows. As Santa Ramere, one of my residency colleagues, aptly put it: “We don’t bring dialogue, we bring statements.” The differences between the European and Japanese shows in terms of resources, place in a process of exploration and development, manners of engagement with a public, and ideas of the social role of art confronted me with aesthetic and ethical quandaries when I had to write reviews of all these shows. It is impossible to hold all the shows to identical standards, to measure them all against fixed criteria.

For once, though, I wasn’t alone in navigating the treacherous waters of cultural criticism. The Critics in Residence program gave me the rare chance to parse and waddle through difficult questions together with other European, Japanese, and Taiwanese critics. Together with Luca Domenico Artuso, Laura Cappelle, Freda Fiala, Kosuke Ikeda, Nabi Ito, Tamás Jászay, Naoko Kogo, Michael Lanigan, Santa Remere, Aistė Šivytė, Kenta Yamazaki, and Tai-Jung Yu, we held symposia on various topics (such as media landscapes, political divisions, or marginality), recorded podcasts, and invited the KEX public to an interactive event where we drew written questions and observations from the audience like in a lottery. The length of the residency allowed us critics to get to know each other well, mining beyond the larger, continental, or global aspects that we share. We discovered points in common at the very first symposia, where journalist and activist Daisuke Tsuda talked about the challenges posed to discourse and dialogue by contemporary media and political developments. Conversely, we explored our unique standpoints and backgrounds as the very ground on which to build solidarities. I extend my thanks and gratitude to my fellow critics, organizers, artists, and spectators who contributed to an unforgettable experience that left a permanent mark on my professional outlook. Ētto, I hope we can continue to keep the dialogue alive.

A longer version of this article appeared on The Theatre Times international performing arts online news portal. Reprinted with permission.

 

Ilinca-Tamara Todoruţ
Tamara Todoruț is a theatre critic, scholar, dramaturg, and translator based in Romania. She earned her doctorate from Yale School of Drama, and now teaches at the Faculty of Theater and Film at Babeș-Bolyai University. Her articles can be found in journals such as Theater, TDR: The Drama Review, Performance Research, Journal of Poverty, European Stages, and Theatre History Studies. She contributed to The Routledge Companion to Dramaturgy, and authored Christoph Schlingensief’s Realist Theater (Routledge 2022). She regularly collaborates with theatre publications such as Scena.ro and TheTheatreTimes.com, and served as Artistic Director of the 2023 International Online Theatre Festival (IOTF).

back to all articles

あいうえおかきくけこさしすせそたちつてとなにぬねのはひふへほまみむめもやゆよらりるれろわゐゑをがぎぐげござじずぜぞだぢづでどばびぶべぼぱぴぷぺぁぃぅぇぉっゃゅアイウエオカキクケコサシスセソタチツテトナニヌネノハヒフヘホマミムメモヤユヨラリルレロワヰヱヲガギグゲゴザジズゼゾダヂズデドバビブベボパピプペポァィゥェォッャュヴ亜哀挨愛曖悪握圧扱宛嵐安案暗以衣位囲医依委威為畏胃尉異移萎偉椅彙意違維慰遺緯域育一壱逸茨芋引印因咽姻員院淫陰飲隠韻右宇羽雨唄鬱畝浦運雲永泳英映栄営詠影鋭衛易疫益液駅悦越謁閲円延沿炎怨宴媛援園煙猿遠鉛塩演縁艶汚王凹央応往押旺欧殴桜翁奥横岡屋億憶臆虞乙俺卸音恩温穏下化火加可仮何花佳価果河苛科架夏家荷華菓貨渦過嫁暇禍靴寡歌箇稼課蚊牙瓦我画芽賀雅餓介回灰会快戒改怪拐悔海界皆械絵開階塊楷解潰壊懐諧貝外劾害崖涯街慨蓋該概骸垣柿各角拡革格核殻郭覚較隔閣確獲嚇穫学岳楽額顎掛潟括活喝渇割葛滑褐轄且株釜鎌刈干刊甘汗缶完肝官冠巻看陥乾勘患貫寒喚堪換敢棺款間閑勧寛幹感漢慣管関歓監緩憾還館環簡観韓艦鑑丸含岸岩玩眼頑顔願企伎危机気岐希忌汽奇祈季紀軌既記起飢鬼帰基寄規亀喜幾揮期棋貴棄毀旗器畿輝機騎技宜偽欺義疑儀戯擬犠議菊吉喫詰却客脚逆虐九久及弓丘旧休吸朽臼求究泣急級糾宮救球給嗅窮牛去巨居拒拠挙虚許距魚御漁凶共叫狂京享供協況峡挟狭恐恭胸脅強教郷境橋矯鏡競響驚仰暁業凝曲局極玉巾斤均近金菌勤琴筋僅禁緊錦謹襟吟銀区句苦駆具惧愚空偶遇隅串屈掘窟熊繰君訓勲薫軍郡群兄刑形系径茎係型契計恵啓掲渓経蛍敬景軽傾携継詣慶憬稽憩警鶏芸迎鯨隙劇撃激桁欠穴血決結傑潔月犬件見券肩建研県倹兼剣拳軒健険圏堅検嫌献絹遣権憲賢謙鍵繭顕験懸元幻玄言弦限原現舷減源厳己戸古呼固股虎孤弧故枯個庫湖雇誇鼓錮顧五互午呉後娯悟碁語誤護口工公勾孔功巧広甲交光向后好江考行坑孝抗攻更効幸拘肯侯厚恒洪皇紅荒郊香候校耕航貢降高康控梗黄喉慌港硬絞項溝鉱構綱酵稿興衡鋼講購乞号合拷剛傲豪克告谷刻国黒穀酷獄骨駒込頃今困昆恨根婚混痕紺魂墾懇左佐沙査砂唆差詐鎖座挫才再災妻采砕宰栽彩採済祭斎細菜最裁債催塞歳載際埼在材剤財罪崎作削昨柵索策酢搾錯咲冊札刷刹拶殺察撮擦雑皿三山参桟蚕惨産傘散算酸賛残斬暫士子支止氏仕史司四市矢旨死糸至伺志私使刺始姉枝祉肢姿思指施師恣紙脂視紫詞歯嗣試詩資飼誌雌摯賜諮示字寺次耳自似児事侍治持時滋慈辞磁餌璽鹿式識軸七叱失室疾執湿嫉漆質実芝写社車舎者射捨赦斜煮遮謝邪蛇尺借酌釈爵若弱寂手主守朱取狩首殊珠酒腫種趣寿受呪授需儒樹収囚州舟秀周宗拾秋臭修袖終羞習週就衆集愁酬醜蹴襲十汁充住柔重従渋銃獣縦叔祝宿淑粛縮塾熟出述術俊春瞬旬巡盾准殉純循順準潤遵処初所書庶暑署緒諸女如助序叙徐除小升少召匠床抄肖尚招承昇松沼昭宵将消症祥称笑唱商渉章紹訟勝掌晶焼焦硝粧詔証象傷奨照詳彰障憧衝賞償礁鐘上丈冗条状乗城浄剰常情場畳蒸縄壌嬢錠譲醸色拭食植殖飾触嘱織職辱尻心申伸臣芯身辛侵信津神唇娠振浸真針深紳進森診寝慎新審震薪親人刃仁尽迅甚陣尋腎須図水吹垂炊帥粋衰推酔遂睡穂随髄枢崇数据杉裾寸瀬是井世正生成西声制姓征性青斉政星牲省凄逝清盛婿晴勢聖誠精製誓静請整醒税夕斥石赤昔析席脊隻惜戚責跡積績籍切折拙窃接設雪摂節説舌絶千川仙占先宣専泉浅洗染扇栓旋船戦煎羨腺詮践箋銭潜線遷選薦繊鮮全前善然禅漸膳繕狙阻祖租素措粗組疎訴塑遡礎双壮早争走奏相荘草送倉捜挿桑巣掃曹曽爽窓創喪痩葬装僧想層総遭槽踪操燥霜騒藻造像増憎蔵贈臓即束足促則息捉速側測俗族属賊続卒率存村孫尊損遜他多汰打妥唾堕惰駄太対体耐待怠胎退帯泰堆袋逮替貸隊滞態戴大代台第題滝宅択沢卓拓託濯諾濁但達脱奪棚誰丹旦担単炭胆探淡短嘆端綻誕鍛団男段断弾暖談壇地池知値恥致遅痴稚置緻竹畜逐蓄築秩窒茶着嫡中仲虫沖宙忠抽注昼柱衷酎鋳駐著貯丁弔庁兆町長挑帳張彫眺釣頂鳥朝貼超腸跳徴嘲潮澄調聴懲直勅捗沈珍朕陳賃鎮追椎墜通痛塚漬坪爪鶴低呈廷弟定底抵邸亭貞帝訂庭逓停偵堤提程艇締諦泥的笛摘滴適敵溺迭哲鉄徹撤天典店点展添転填田伝殿電斗吐妬徒途都渡塗賭土奴努度怒刀冬灯当投豆東到逃倒凍唐島桃討透党悼盗陶塔搭棟湯痘登答等筒統稲踏糖頭謄藤闘騰同洞胴動堂童道働銅導瞳峠匿特得督徳篤毒独読栃凸突届屯豚頓貪鈍曇丼那奈内梨謎鍋南軟難二尼弐匂肉虹日入乳尿任妊忍認寧熱年念捻粘燃悩納能脳農濃把波派破覇馬婆罵拝杯背肺俳配排敗廃輩売倍梅培陪媒買賠白伯拍泊迫剥舶博薄麦漠縛爆箱箸畑肌八鉢発髪伐抜罰閥反半氾犯帆汎伴判坂阪板版班畔般販斑飯搬煩頒範繁藩晩番蛮盤比皮妃否批彼披肥非卑飛疲秘被悲扉費碑罷避尾眉美備微鼻膝肘匹必泌筆姫百氷表俵票評漂標苗秒病描猫品浜貧賓頻敏瓶不夫父付布扶府怖阜附訃負赴浮婦符富普腐敷膚賦譜侮武部舞封風伏服副幅復福腹複覆払沸仏物粉紛雰噴墳憤奮分文聞丙平兵併並柄陛閉塀幣弊蔽餅米壁璧癖別蔑片辺返変偏遍編弁便勉歩保哺捕補舗母募墓慕暮簿方包芳邦奉宝抱放法泡胞俸倣峰砲崩訪報蜂豊飽褒縫亡乏忙坊妨忘防房肪某冒剖紡望傍帽棒貿貌暴膨謀頬北木朴牧睦僕墨撲没勃堀本奔翻凡盆麻摩磨魔毎妹枚昧埋幕膜枕又末抹万満慢漫未味魅岬密蜜脈妙民眠矛務無夢霧娘名命明迷冥盟銘鳴滅免面綿麺茂模毛妄盲耗猛網目黙門紋問冶夜野弥厄役約訳薬躍闇由油喩愉諭輸癒唯友有勇幽悠郵湧猶裕遊雄誘憂融優与予余誉預幼用羊妖洋要容庸揚揺葉陽溶腰様瘍踊窯養擁謡曜抑沃浴欲翌翼拉裸羅来雷頼絡落酪辣乱卵覧濫藍欄吏利里理痢裏履璃離陸立律慄略柳流留竜粒隆硫侶旅虜慮了両良料涼猟陵量僚領寮療瞭糧力緑林厘倫輪隣臨瑠涙累塁類令礼冷励戻例鈴零霊隷齢麗暦歴列劣烈裂恋連廉練錬呂炉賂路露老労弄郎朗浪廊楼漏籠六録麓論和話賄脇惑枠湾腕𠮷×ん々吾